The featured article on Superfactory in January is a piece by one of the heavyweights of the lean movement, Richard Schonberger, titled The Skinny on Lean Management. His primary point deals with how lean affects sales and marketing, and he decidedly takes traditional accounting to task as well.
Lean management doesn’t resonate in marketing and sales. Nor does it among boards, senior executives and investors. Reasons relate to where lean tends to do most of its work - in operations - and its usual presentation as an attack on waste. Obscured are its much greater potential in the distribution pipelines and its strong customer focus.
It was one of his final statements that really surprised me.
Wal-Mart a "grand champion" of lean supply chains? That raised my eyebrows more than a bit. We've taken the company to task several times for pounding on suppliers and creating incredibly long supply chains by outsourcing to China.
Long lead times caused by long supply chains. Compare that to one of my comments on my visit to American Apparel a couple months ago:
The outsourcing and long supply chains are definitely not "lean" in my mind. After talking with Richard on these issues, he did make one good point: "pounding on suppliers" is sometimes more beneficial than being "nice" as Wal-Mart's suppliers, the ones that survive, also tend to become extremely strong competitors in other markets. They have to in order to make a buck off of Wal-Mart.
I personally don't shop at Wal-Mart, not out of any protest but simply because I find their stores very claustrophobic. Just too much stuff. I don't need any more stuff, and my clothes shopping is limited to about three times a year, 90% of which is at one store. That's all I can handle. Quality over quantity.
Wal-Mart does deserve some credit. They've been very successful... millions of people can now afford products they previously could not, and hundreds of thousands of people have jobs that previously would not have. Some may not like the quality of job or how the products are made, but those two facts are still real.
I've never been afraid of Wal-Mart, unlike those that said they have become just too big. We said the same about Montgomery Wards, Sears, Microsoft and others. Perhaps in a decade we'll say the same about Wal-Mart. The top of the heap have a tendency to be displaced by game-changing methods and technologies. A company called Tesco, which we've talked about previously in terms of their lean prowess, may soon put Wal-Mart on the run.
Analysts say that Tesco's big advantage over major international rivals, which also include Germany's AldiLidl, is its unrivaled ability to manage vast reams of data and translate that knowledge into sales. While data crunching may sound dull, it has given Tesco two major advantages: an unmatched ability to operate multiple retail formats—ranging in size from convenience stores to hypermarkets—and the market knowledge to offer what many analysts say is the best and broadest range of house brands from any retailer. and
Two monster retailers duking it out using high tech tools to get consumers what they want, when they want it, at the lowest possible price. Sounds pretty good to me. And fun to watch to boot.